Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/01/2010 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB357 | |
HB344 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 357 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 357 "An Act relating to the sale of land owned by the Alaska Railroad that is not needed for railroad purposes." 1:40:48 PM JOHN COAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL STOLTZE explained the legislation. He explained that HB 357 is an act giving the Alaska Railroad Corporation the ability to sell land that is not used for railroad purposes. The bill does not establish a method for the railroad to liquidate land assets or force the railroad to dispose of any lease hold interests. The legislation creates flexibility to sell unneeded land. The bill received numerous letters of support from unhappy leaseholders that do not have the ability to purchase the property they have improved. The letters were unsolicited and the lease holders are reluctant to make new or additional improvements for fear that they will not be able to adjust their lease or purchase the property. The bill was designed to give a voice to the lease holders. Representative Austerman understood that the legislation indicated that the railroad cannot sell land. Co-Chair Stoltze concurred, but stated that a more precise definition will be available during testimony from the Alaska Railroad Corporation. Representative Salmon asked if the legislation affected the land surrounding Nenana. Co-Chair Stoltze responded that the legislation might affect the mentioned area, but a designated area is not mandated. The intent was not geocentric, but instead affects the landholding of the whole Alaska Railroad. Representative Salmon commented that the Alaska Railroad owns the land surrounding the loading dock in Nenana. He referenced reports of the steep prices charged to maintain and lease the land. He opined that the action constituted a disadvantage to the barge company. Much of the high lease rate is passed on to inhabitants of villages. Representative Salmon stated concerns. He referenced that other village entities having difficulty with the high lease payments. 1:46:32 PM Co-Chair Stoltze referred to other concerns raised regarding the Alaska Railroad. The legislation spurred many similar comments. Representative Gara reported many questions about railroad issues. He was concerned that the state allows the railroad to control the land that they own. He expressed concern about allowing the railroad to sell state land and keep the money. He opined that the railroad might take what belongs to the people and use the money for internal operations that the legislature may or may not agree with. Co-Chair Stoltze opined that funds would not be eligible for use without legislative intervention. He agreed that problems existed. He reported that the testimony would provide answers. Representative Austerman viewed that the scenario is such that the railroad has the ability to lease the land at the chosen rate. Co-Chair Stoltze concurred. Representative Austerman pointed out that the railroad already has the ability to use lease money for salaries. Representative Gara communicated the limitation of short term leases as an advantage. Another benefit of the limited lease was that the state will eventually reclaim the land. With the legislation, the railroad receives the money and the state never sees the land again. Co-Chair Stoltze acknowledged the many questions associated with the legislation. 1:51:04 PM PETER MACKSEY, CUSTOMER RELATIONS, STEELFAB, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), addressed Representative Gara's comment and opined that the investment made by some people would be difficult if the state took the land back. He stated that he felt confined by the railroad periodically raising the rent. He commented that the mentioned property is without rail and he believed that the railroad has no further use for the land. A piece of property in Anchorage leased under the railroad is heavily taxed. He opined that with private ownership, the investment and sense of worth would be greater. He announced that the railroad increases stress levels with the steep lease prices. Representative Doogan requested more detail on the statement "taxed as if own the land." Mr. Macksey responded that he paid property taxes in addition to taxes for the City of Anchorage. Co-Chair Stoltze commented that the municipal of Anchorage taxed airport property in a similar manner. Representative Doogan asked where the land was located. Mr. Macksey replied Railroad Avenue. 1:55:51 PM Representative Gara asked if Mr. Macksey realized that the land was owned by the railroad when he agreed to lease it. Mr. Macksey responded that many of the leases were 100 year leases and the original intent was to provide an industrial base for Anchorage. He believed that the length of time that his company existed on the land warranted the option to buy. JOHN BINKLEY, CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), commented that the legislation highlighted the importance of the relationship between the lessees and the Alaska Railroad Corporation. The real estate division of the Alaska Railroad Corporation is critical to the corporation's success. The real estate division relies completely on the revenue from the lessees. The steady revenue provided by the lessees allows the corporation to succeed throughout varying business cycles. Mr. Binkley shared that the board understands the need to renew efforts to communicate well with the tenants. He mentioned the railroad's fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders of Alaska to treat lessees in an equal manner and to receive a fair return on the asset value. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the people of Alaska receive a fair return for the asset made on the leased land. 2:00:22 PM Mr. Binkley referred to a mechanism already in place to release Alaska Railroad Corporation land utilizing a procedure to determine public purpose and report to the legislature for advice. He believed the legislation would refine the process. Representative Austerman asked Mr. Binkley's stand on the bill. Mr. Binkley reported that the railroad was "not necessarily supportive" of the legislation. The board believed that the mechanisms were already in place in terms of discharging land with the appropriate role of the legislature. He repeated that the opinions of the lessees were important to him. Representative Doogan asked how many lessees the railroad had under contract. Mr. Binkley responded approximately 250. Representative Doogan asked for the annual basis income. Mr. Binkley replied approximately $9 million. Representative Doogan queried the annual budget. Mr. Binkley replied that the corporation had operating revenues of $143 million or approximately 7 percent. Representative Gara referred to years of net income for railroad from leaseholds not operations; if that were true he expressed concern about the lessening of leasehold rental potential. He asked how long the corporation's net income has been attributable to its leasehold interest. Mr. Binkley responded that the income goes up and down; in some years the real estate is necessary to carry the corporation through, in other years the corporation creates a return on the operations of the railroad plus the real estate. The railroad was experiencing tough times because of less fuel availability leading to a reduction in the bottom line. 2:05:26 PM Representative Gara asked what the railroad was doing to accommodate lessees. He asked about any changes made by the corporation regarding the treatment and communication with lessees. Mr. Binkley responded that an important issue was sound communication with lessees to enable businesses to succeed. He referred to the extension of leases from 35 years to 55 years for increased stability. Representative Gara asked if companies like SteelFab would lose their improvements. Mr. Binkley hoped SteelFab would not; he wanted them to succeed and commended their achievements. Co-Chair Stoltze noted that the purpose of the legislation was not to sell the land but instead to function like a permanent fund within the railroad. The corporation would use the earnings for their operations. 2:09:06 PM Representative Salmon asked about the lease situation in Nenana with the cost passed on to the village people. He believed the legislation would change nothing. He wanted action and not just talk. Co-Chair Stoltze advocated for the bill, which will lead to discussion and potentially change. Mr. Binkley stated that the railroad is working with Nenana to renew the lease. He discussed the history of the railroad as part of the overall transportation system. He mentioned the process of renegotiating a lease for the dock properties. He reiterated promises to communicate better with lessees and support their success. Representative Austerman asked about a standard year renegotiated contract or yearly fee. Mr. Binkley responded that the corporation re-evaluates every five years and a reappraisal is presented with a ceiling no greater than 35 percent. Representative Kelly queried the concerns of the railroad. Mr. Binkley replied that the railroad does not want to sell the real estate. He expressed concern regarding the importance of the railroad's success being tied to the real estate. He mentioned that the railroad has operated as a state owned entity for 25 years without annual requests for operating funds. He pointed out that the state would suffer the loss of the real estate even if the proceeds were reinvested. He noted that real estate is a great investment. He commented on the wisdom of the Alaska Legislature in establishing the Alaska Railroad Corporation. 2:15:27 PM Co-Chair Stoltze commented that additional testimony for the railroad would be organized by Mr. Binkley. MARK STEARNS, OWNER, ALASKA WOOD MOULDING, INC., ANCHORAGE (via teleconference) informed that he has been a lease holder for ten years. He provided the history of increasing lease prices for his company. He discussed his experience with changes in lease terms without notice or discussion. He understood that the railroad has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the benefit of their assets for the shareholders. He understood the need to utilize the property as a revenue source. Mr. Stearns referred to other buildings in the area that have been taken over by the railroad. He understood that the money earned from the sale of the land could be used as a permanent fund; the railroad did not lose the value. He was concerned with a long-term ability to control expenses for his business. The lease has gone up dramatically, which hurts the ability to reinvest in the business. Representative Kelly pointed out that HB 357 would only permit the railroad to sell the land if they chose to. He asked how the bill would help. Mr. Stearns explained that the mentioned property was not used by the railroad. He believed that the property that he leases is not essential to the railroad's operations. He argued that if the railroad does not require land as an essential part of their operation, then the sale of land would only strengthen the business climate. 2:23:10 PM Co-Chair Stoltze pointed out that Mr. Binkley was responsive to the needs of the lessees. Representative Doogan asked about the municipality of Anchorage's decision to tax lessees. Mr. Stearns confirmed that he was taxed by the Municipality of Anchorage for an additional $6 thousand per year. He pointed out that his company pays an additional $26 thousand in taxes each year as a result of the changes instituted by the railroad. Representative Doogan asked about the lease rate increases. He asked about the communication with the railroad following the rate increase notices. Mr. Stearns responded that he received the information "just because" and listed problems that the railroad responded to by requesting a letter. He stated that the damage has been done. 2:28:16 PM Representative Kelly asked if property was sold during a lease expiration time, would improvement costs be required. Mr. Stearns replied that the improvements on the property belong to his business "from the ground up." Representative Kelly verified that the answer provided was no. He asked if the corporation would own the improvements if he did not renew his lease. Mr. Stearns replied that the corporation could own the improvements or they could request or require that the improvements were removed. BONNE WOLDSTAD, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), had concerns about the legislation. She expressed that the bill might solidify the inverse take that the railroad created on her property in 2003 by repealing Sections 1208 and 1209 of the Alaska Railroad Transfer Act (ARTA). She explained that she owned a homestead that predates the railroad. The railroad received an exclusive use easement on her property. She expressed concern that the corporation might sell her land. Co-Chair Stoltze expressed a lack of understanding regarding the railroad transfer. Ms. Woldstad pointed out that ARTA stated that if railroad track was unused for 18 years, then it would be declared vacant and revert back to the adjacent property owner. 2:33:48 PM Representative Kelly asked if a change in language would help to ensure that the bill did not negatively affect the property. Ms. Woldstad responded that language might be inserted to recognize that if the railroad was to vacate their easement with a prior existing right, then the land would revert back to the adjacent property owner. Representative Kelly commented that a language change might be difficult to achieve, as he was not the bill sponsor. Ms. Woldstad thought that a language change would alleviate concerns that the bill is not intended to prejudice those ownership rights. Representative Fairclough asked if the easement was passed, was the homestead compensated by the railroad. Ms. Woldstad stated that she had not found record of compensation under the original 1914 law. Following changes in the original Homestead Act of 1862, any future homestead had a clause into patent for construction of railroad, telegraph, and telephone lines. The territory had the right to traverse by the Homestead Act, but not to own. Co-Chair Stoltze promised to follow up on the issue. TERRY SMITH, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CARLILE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference) stated that the railroad has been a good partner, but his personal standpoint was that the amount of road controlled by the railroad leads to scarcity. He added that leased land is not favored as collateral in lending situations. He understood the value of land ownership for the railroad, but for investors the preference is to reduce risk and gain ownership to control destiny. 2:39:18 PM Ms. Woldstad commented on the fiduciary rights of the state. She wished to communicate the maximum benefit by considering the jobs provided by the lessees. 2:40:36 PM AT EASE 2:42:33 PM RECONVENED Representative Austerman asked how the railroad arrived at 8 percent. Mr. Binkley responded that 8 percent is the corporation's policy with a couple of exceptions including waterfront land. Representative Austerman clarified that the action was determined via board policy. Mr. Binkley concurred and stated that the action was consistent for leases around the state. Many leases were initiated under the federal government and rather than terminating the leases, the state allowed federal leases to lapse under the terms and conditions of the federal government. Many of the leases were a better deal for leaseholders than state system. He understood the shock when the federal leases expired placing them under the state system. Representative Austerman asked when municipalities of Anchorage and Fairbanks initiated any adjustment on leases from the railroad. Mr. Binkley replied that there was not an adjustment by the railroad when the lessees paid the additional amount for property taxes. Some lessees express that the cost of the lease can be expensed over a period of time; from a tax standpoint, there is sometimes an advantage to leasing. 2:46:21 PM Co-Chair Stoltze suggested that this was the permissive nature to be discussed between the government owner and the lease holder. He appreciated the discussion and the testimony from the Alaska Railroad Corporation. Representative Austerman commented that he understood that the leasing agreement presents a good deal for the railroad. Co-Chair Stoltze agreed that the legislation provided a permissive route for the Alaska Railroad Corporation. HB 357 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further consideration. 2:49:10 PM AT EASE 2:56:55 PM RECONVENED
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB357 Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 357 |
HB344 PSPA support.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
HB 344--Alaska Tax Division 2009 Detail[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
HB 344N Pac Seafood support.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
HB 344--Qualified and Non-qualified Expenditures[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
peter pan Letter HB 344.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
PSPA support.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
|
ss Hb 344 Sponsor Statement.doc |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
HB 344 CS WORKDRAFT 26-LS1473 E Version.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |
HB 344 Letter Icicle Seafoods.pdf |
HFIN 4/1/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 344 |